Connect with us

DiamondBuzz

De Beers Shuts Down Lightbox, to Refocus on Naturals

Citing steep price declines and shifting market dynamics, De Beers discontinues its lab-grown jewelry brand to focus on premium natural diamond offerings under its renewed “Origins Strategy.”

Published

on

De Beers has announced the planned closure of its lab-grown diamond jewelry brand, Lightbox, marking a strategic pivot back to its core business of natural diamonds. The company is currently in talks with potential buyers for Lightbox’s assets, including its remaining inventory, as it seeks to streamline operations and focus on higher-value market segments.

Launched in 2018, Lightbox was positioned as an accessible lab-grown diamond (LGD) brand, offering transparent pricing at $800 per carat to underscore the difference in value between lab-grown and natural diamonds. However, since then, the LGD jewelry market has experienced a dramatic shift, with wholesale prices falling by approximately 90% due to oversupply and intensifying global competition—especially from low-cost producers in China and mass-market retailers in the U.S.

De Beers cited this sustained price decline as the primary driver behind the decision to discontinue the brand. According to the company, the move aligns with its belief that lab-grown diamonds, increasingly commoditized, occupy a fundamentally different category from natural diamonds, which are positioned as rare, emotionally significant, and high-value.

The closure is part of the broader “Origins Strategy” unveiled in May 2024, which aims to refocus the business on high-return areas and reinvigorate consumer demand for natural diamonds. This includes increased investment in industry-wide marketing and initiatives that emphasize the unique value proposition of natural stones.

De Beers Group CEO Al Cook commented, “The persistently declining value of lab-grown diamonds in jewelry underscores the growing differentiation between these factory-made products and natural diamonds. As lab-grown production expands and prices drop, the gap will only widen.”

De Beers affirmed that it will support all current Lightbox customers through the transition, maintaining warranties and after-sales services. The company is also working closely with employees, retail partners, and suppliers to ensure a smooth wind-down of operations.

Meanwhile, De Beers’ synthetic diamond manufacturing subsidiary, Element Six, will shift its focus entirely to industrial and technological applications, where synthetic diamonds continue to show strong growth potential. “We are excited about the expanding role synthetic diamonds can play in fields like quantum computing, high-performance electronics, and medical technology,” Cook added

Continue Reading
Advertisement JewelBuzz Banner
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

DiamondBuzz

CVD Synthetic Fashioned To Imitate A Rough Natural Diamond

The Near-Colorless Stone Is Believed To Be The First Time Creators Of A Synthetic Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) Diamond Have Shaped It To Resemble A Rough Diamond

Published

on

The 6.87-carat near-colorless CVD diamond was shaped to resemble a natural rough octahedral crystal but showed distinct synthetic features under microscopic and spectroscopic analysis.GIA’s tests confirmed the stone’s synthetic origin, noting polishing marks, facet junction roughness, and luminescence patterns inconsistent with natural diamonds.

No evidence currently suggests widespread substitution of synthetics for rough natural diamonds, but existing detection tools could be adapted if such cases increase.

The near-colorless stone is believed to be the first time creators of a synthetic chemical vapor deposition (CVD) diamond have shaped it to resemble a rough diamond, according to an article in the spring issue of the institute’s Gems & Gemology quarterly journal.

Upon investigation with the use of raman spectroscopy, the results confirmed that the material was a diamond, with its near-octahedral shape similar to that of a natural rough crystal. Further analysis showed that it was not a true octahedron, as only one set of opposing faces was parallel. Microscopic observation under differential interference contrast revealed extremely flat faces marked mainly by parallel polishing lines, unlike the growth steps and trigons typically seen on natural octahedral faces. The facet junctions were extremely rough, possibly due to measures taken to improve the color, after which the main faces appear to have been repolished, the institute explained.

Continue Reading

Trending

JewelBuzz is Asia’s First Digital Jewellery Media & India’s No.1 B2B Jewellery Magazine, published by AM Media House. Since 2016, we’ve been the trusted source for jewellery news, market trends, trade insights, exhibitions, podcasts, and brand stories, connecting jewellers, retailers, and industry professionals worldwide.

We would like to hear from you...

GET WHATSAPP NEWS ALERTS

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x