Connect with us

International News

WGC Gold Market Commentary: Riding a wave of uncertainty

Published

on

Dollar weakness and ETF flows fuel gold 

Gold continued its uptrend in February, hitting multiple new highs before pulling  back to end the month at US$2,835/oz – up 0.8% m/m.1 This performance was  echoed across major currencies, all of which also registered new record highs (Table 1). General interest in gold was bolstered by continued flows of gold into  COMEX inventories, driven by continued tariff uncertainty. 

Gold hit new highs during the  month, supported by a weaker US  dollar, extending its y-t-d gains to  9percent According to our Gold Return Attribution Model (GRAM), US dollar weakness  during the month was one of the primary drivers of gold’s performance,  alongside an increase in geopolitical risk and a drop in interest rates (Chart 1).  And while gold’s strong price appreciation in January created a small drag, it was  counterbalanced by positive support from flight-to-quality flows. This was best  illustrated by gold ETF activity, which saw massive net inflows of US$9.4bn (100t) – the strongest month since March 2022 – led by US- and Asian-listed funds.  

Reassessing risk and reward 

• The “Trump trade” – stronger dollar and US stocks – has  taken a back seat amidst concerns about tariffs and hawkish foreign policies, conditions that will likely remain 

• As governments look to increase military spending,  budgets deficits are likely to increase and credit ratings to fall 

• At the same time, despite inflationary pressures, markets  expect a more dovish Fed, pricing in at least two full rate  cuts by the end of the year  

• These factors combined are creating a particularly  supportive environment for gold.  

Risk-off in, risk-on out

The “Trump trade” – which hinged on the pro-US growth  agenda of the new administration and fuelled a dollar and  stock rally post US election – appears to have faded. 

While European stocks continue to do well, the major  beneficiaries have been risk-off assets such as US Treasuries  and gold (Chart 2). 

Inflation is bubbling up 

Trump‘s campaign agenda hinged on a few key items,  including: tariffs, immigration and tax cuts2 – all of which  have the potential to flare up inflation However, assessing the economic impact of tariffs is not  straightforward: while they might be inflationary in a very  strong economy, they could lower spending in a weaker  one.3 And there are already signs that consumer sentiment  in the US is beginning to falter: the University of Michigan  consumer and expectation surveys are at their lowest level  since 2023.4 

Lower levels of immigration (and higher deportations) will  likely lead to higher labour costs, although the strength of  the labour market is key to determine its full effect. Nominal  wages in the US are currently plateauing while potential  large-scale Federal layoffs could increase labour supply.  However, those workers are unlikely to fill the spaces left by  immigration. 

Tax cuts for businesses and the wealthy will boost growth  and inflation. However, any anticipated boost from tax cuts  has yet to materialise as they may take ‘months to  negotiate’.5 

Uncertainty, uncertainty, uncertainty 

Investor nervousness has pushed bond prices higher and  yields lower. Market participants now expect two full rate  cuts by the end of the year…a far more dovish read from  mid-January, pre-Trump inauguration. And the probability of  a Fed hike appears to have peaked .

While January inflation data generally runs hot, policymakers  at the Fed seem content with the progress that has been  made so far. At the same time, elevated uncertainty was  heavily cited in the last meeting minutes, whether through  tariffs, immigration or domestic policy, such as potential  large-scale Federal layoffs, a nod to the Fed’s dual mandate  of price stability and full employment.

What’s more, US Treasury Secretary Bessent’s comments  that they are focused on bringing down the 10-year yield has  also served to ease conditions somewhat.

New world (dis)order?

Negotiations to end the Russia-Ukraine war have led to  much handwringing and consternation, particularly across  Europe during February. This has compounded already  elevated geopolitical uncertainty as positive outcomes are by  no means guaranteed and existing political alliances are  being questioned. 

Speculation that Europe will need to ramp up defence spending going forward – resulting in larger deficits – has  already pushed up borrowing costs. Yield curves on  European sovereign debt have become increasingly steep;  short-term rates are falling while long-term rates remain  high as expectations grow for an increased supply of long dated debt.

The UK has already committed to increase defence funding,8 and Germany’s future chancellor, Friedrich Merz, has begun  discussions on the topic.9 For the latter, this could be further  

complicated by the potential need to rely on the support of  fringe parties after a somewhat mixed election outcome.10 The performance of the European defence sector, one of the  best this year, is reflecting the likely continuation of this  trend.  

Should a resolution to the Russia-Ukraine war be found –  and importantly, this will need to be one agreeable to all  parties – this could dampen any geopolitical risk premium in  gold. But it remains to be seen whether real progress can be  made and, if so, what the implications will be. Until then, it is  likely that gold will remain well supported. 

Perfect conditions for gold? 

Uncertainty appears to be the undertone across markets.  Concerns over tariffs, and the wide-ranging impact they  could have on global growth, continue to cast a cloud and  question US exceptionalism. This has added to already rising  geopolitical risk. Recent events have highlighted the need for  greater military spending, which will likely result in even  higher deficits. 

There are several factors that could reinstate the thorny  problem of higher inflation, especially at a time when  deteriorating economic conditions may necessitate interest  rates staying low. The US economy is likely in ‘stagflation’ and  consumers appear to see it that way.

Historically, each of these drivers has individually been  positive for gold. A move up in the GPR index of 100 points  is typically linked to a 2.5% increase in the price of gold, all  else equal. Similarly, a rise in 10-year break-even inflation  expectations of 50bps is typically associated with an approx.  4% rise in gold prices. And a 50bps fall in 10-year Treasury rates over the long-run has been associated with a 2.5% rise  in gold. 

Although these drivers seldom occur simultaneously, their  combined effect can create an environment in which gold  can continue to perform positively.  

It is worth noting, nonetheless, that a solid fundamental case  for gold still must scale the hurdle of a temporary technical  stretched price. A retracement may create short-term  headwinds but could also provide a welcome respite for uninitiated investors, as well as for consumer gold demand . In all, we expect gold to remain in the limelight  given the current market conditions.

Continue Reading
Advertisement JewelBuzz Banner
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

International News

WGC Gold Market Commentary: Hiking Up A Volcano

Gold Is Also Facing Near-Term Headwinds and Significant Oil Shock Could Prolong The Malaise.

Published

on

Gold fell 1% in May, on continued positive risk sentiment and modest global gold ETF outflows.

The Fed may need to hike rates as inflation pressures mount. We make the case for why it could – surprisingly – benefit gold. But gold also faces headwinds, which could be prolonged if the Hormuz standoff drags on.

Nothing to see here

Gold fell 1% in May, finishing the month at US$4,546/oz, and marginally lower in most major currencies. India and Turkey saw monthly gains

According to our Gold Return Attribution Model (GRAM), there were no stand out drivers for gold’s performance in May from the explicit variables in the model. Positive risk sentiment via equity inflows, less bond inflows, and a fall in implied volatility proved a minor drag, alongside gold ETF outflows from Asia and the US (US$2.3bn, 17.3t). US dollar weakness helped gold at the margin, as did momentum factors including European gold ETF inflows (US$0.3bn, 1.2t). Other opaque flows – possibly in the over-the-counter (OTC) market, not captured explicitly in our model – may have been a contributor to the negative residual.

COMEX managed money futures positioning continued to linger in neutral territory with a very modest gain of US$1.4bn (8t) in May.

Hiking up a volcano

The Fed may have to hike later this year and that could spell trouble for risk assets and the economy. History is mixed when it comes to hikes and gold’s response

Notable precedents show similarities to today and on those occasions gold responded positively to a hike

But gold is also facing near-term headwinds and significant oil shock could prolong the malaise.

Following a somewhat contentious US rate-cutting cycle that began in 2024, the market has pivoted to the strong possibility of rate hikes into year-end and beyond, with a firm economy facing pass-through inflation pressures. This could weigh on risk assets through discount rates, as well as increase borrowing costs for households and businesses.

Convention has it that higher policy rates pressure gold through higher real yields and a stronger US dollar. The evidence is mixed. Historically, rate hikes have not seen a uniform response from yields, the dollar or gold.

The data: Gold has positively surprised on hikes more than 50% of the time. It’s median one-month (21-day) return following hikes – adjusted for the long-run average 21-day return of 0.84% – has been positive.1

Context: What matters more than the policy rate itself is how markets interpret the implications of tightening for growth, inflation credibility, financial stability and the US dollar

This time may be different: In prior cycles, hikes often signalled policy credibility and economic normalisation. Today, however, hikes may increasingly signal:

Persistent inflation pressure as resource nationalism ramps up

Fiscal stress both in the US and abroad

Policy error risk on more divergent FOMC views, political pressure and the fear of getting it wrong (again).

Cue the US dollar: Historically the US dollar appeared more important to gold’s fortunes than to rates. Medium term growth and yield convergence, and a diversification push away from US assets, has set quite a clear path for a weaker dollar ahead, upon which consensus is agreed.

Other things matter: Demand from China, India and central banks is structurally less sensitive to US rates and could provide support beyond the current lull

Risk asset fragility: Higher rates may prove to be the last straw for equity markets. Aside from the mechanical repricing of discount rates, Vanda Research notes that even relatively modest rises in long-end Treasury yields have repeatedly destabilised short-term equity rallies over the past couple of years.2

When and why hikes benefited gold

There are notable historical precedents during which gold bucked expectations with a positive hike

29 June 2006: This was the final hike in a cycle; housing was slowing and growth concerns were mounting. Gold was also in an early innings of rate-insensitive buying from a recently liberated Chinese investment market, the advent of gold ETFs, and a commodity boom. In other words, the Fed was hiking into fragility and ‘other’ things mattered – as they do today

15 March 2017: The post-election reflation trade and long-dollar positioning had become crowded. The hike was interpreted as dovish relative to expectations and long-end yields declined.3 The case for a resumption of dollar weakness today is strong and widely held even as positioning is neutral

19 December 2018: Markets interpreted the hike as a policy error, resulting in a sharp equity sell off4 and long-end yields collapsed. The possibility today of a policy error with a more divided and potentially politicised Fed is non-zero

2 November 2022: An aggressive hiking cycle collided with growing market fragility. The UK LDI crisis had already destabilised bond markets and the US dollar subsequently peaked.5 Today long bond yields are rising across the G10 on fiscal fears and long-term inflation concerns. And gold has a decent track record of responding to geopolitical spikes

22 March 2023: The Fed tightened into acute banking stress. Long-end yields fell sharply as markets accelerated expectations of a pause and eventual easing.6 There are no clear signs of banking stress today, but concerns have grown over private credit.

What could go wrong?

Our argument is not that a hike is inherently bullish for gold.

Historically, hikes have tended to be negative for gold if they strengthen the US dollar, lift real yields and boost sentiment If a hiking cycle materially improves the market’s assessment of Fed credibility, gold could face additional pressure.

Some physical markets appear to have softened, with discounts in India, South Korea and anecdotal evidence of some selling in Japan. Global gold ETF flows have been lacklustre in May. The possibility of sporadic official-sector swaps or sales remains as the Hormuz Strait standoff continues. Technically, gold remains vulnerable – perched on its 200-day moving average, in what looks like a declining channel.

The largest near-term risk may come from energy markets. Oil is dominating headlines and inflation expectations, as well as driving bond yields. A sharp rise in energy prices driven by inventory depletion could initially push yields higher, strengthen the dollar and extend gold’s current malaise before the longer-term implications become apparent.7

Our main models generally associate rate rises with gold price falls, with price rises the exception rather than the rule. The argument here is simply that if hikes ultimately arrive, there is a reasonable case for the exception to occur. Rather than reinforcing confidence, markets may interpret them as evidence of underlying fragility.

Continue Reading

Trending

JewelBuzz is Asia’s First Digital Jewellery Media & India’s No.1 B2B Jewellery Magazine, published by AM Media House. Since 2016, we’ve been the trusted source for jewellery news, market trends, trade insights, exhibitions, podcasts, and brand stories, connecting jewellers, retailers, and industry professionals worldwide.

We would like to hear from you...

GET WHATSAPP NEWS ALERTS

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x