Connect with us

International News

94 tonnes of tokenized gold  moved instantly for 0.0016% in fees

Published

on

94 tonnes of tokenized gold ( XAUt ) was moved instantly for 0.0016% in fees over the last 6 months – while central banks spend millions of dollars to move  their bullion

That comparison, recently highlighted by Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino in February 2026, perfectly captures the “analog vs. digital” divide in modern finance.

Moving 94 tonnes of physical gold is a logistical nightmare involving armored convoys, specialized aircraft, and massive insurance premiums. Doing the same with Tether Gold (XAUt) is essentially just updating a ledger on a blockchain.

While the efficiency is undeniable, it is worth noting that central banks aren’t switching to XAUt just yet for one primary reason: Sovereignty. Central banks move gold to ensure they have physical possession within their own borders during geopolitical crises. For them, the “millions spent” is an insurance policy against systemic collapse. However, for every other use case—trading, hedging, and payments—the 0.0016% fee makes a very compelling argument for tokenization.

The efficiency gap between tokenized assets and legacy bullion logistics is most evident when comparing the movement of 94 tonnes of gold. Over the last six months, Tether Gold (XAUt) facilitated this massive transfer of value with a total fee of just 0.0016%, a figure that stands in stark contrast to the millions of dollars central banks must spend on armored transport, international security, and insurance for physical repatriation.

While physical gold movement is a sluggish process—often taking weeks or months to navigate the complexities of global logistics—tokenized gold operates with near-instant finality on the blockchain. Furthermore, the digital format allows for extreme utility; XAUt is divisible down to 0.000001 troy oz, whereas central banks are restricted to handling physical bars and coins, which are difficult to move, store, and fractionally trade.

Continue Reading
Advertisement JewelBuzz Banner
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

International News

De Beers Assumes 100% Control Of Gahcho Kué Diamond Mine

A Global Slump In Diamond Demand Hit The Company Hard. Its Revenue Dropped 42% In 2025, and Average Diamond Prices Plummete

Published

on

De Beers is taking 100% control of the Gahcho Kué diamond mine in Canada’s Northwest Territories. Its partner, Mountain Province Diamonds, was facing major financial trouble and agreed to hand over its 49% share in exchange for being cleared of all its debts to De Beers.

​Here is why Mountain Province ran into trouble:

​Falling Diamond Prices: A global slump in diamond demand hit the company hard. Its revenue dropped 42% in 2025, and average diamond prices plummeted—falling to just $36 per carat in the second quarter.

​Massive Debt: Mountain Province was struggling to pay back tens of millions of dollars in short-term loans. Ratings agency S&P warning that the company was at high risk of defaulting on its debts.

​Cost-Cutting and Emergency Funds: To stay afloat, the company paused expansion plans at the mine, delayed payments into environmental cleanup funds, and sold future diamond sales rights to major investor Dermot Desmond (an Irish billionaire) for quick cash.

​Despite selling twice as many diamonds recently, prices were too low to cover their debts.

CEO Jonathan Comerford explained that trade tariffs and Middle East conflicts crushed diamond prices, leaving handing over their share of the mine as the best option to cancel liabilities and secure local jobs.

Continue Reading

Trending

JewelBuzz is Asia’s First Digital Jewellery Media & India’s No.1 B2B Jewellery Magazine, published by AM Media House. Since 2016, we’ve been the trusted source for jewellery news, market trends, trade insights, exhibitions, podcasts, and brand stories, connecting jewellers, retailers, and industry professionals worldwide.

We would like to hear from you...

GET WHATSAPP NEWS ALERTS

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x